UK SEO and Internet Marketing Forums
Link Partners Needed

Hi All,


We need to find some good websites where we can buy space to place a box of text links.
They don't have to be prominent, can be nicely designed way way at the bottom of your website, for a fixed monthly fee (Usually starting at around £50.00 per month, all dependent on the quality of your website, its page rank etc.)

We are ideally looking for PR3 & higher sites and place a block of upto 9 links on the page

We pay the following :
PR 3 : £30
PR 4 : £50
PR 5 : £55
PR 6 : £65

If anyone is interested and would like to know more, please PM me

We've found several partners on other forums before and now we need a few more!

Cheers

Chris

sorry but beg to differ..

and its not reciprocal linking as its 1 way links ( outbound )

partly true .. just because the site linking out may not be relevant to the inbound site a high PR will have an effect

and PR did used to be just a gimmick but google have worked it into their algorithm to determine results .. have done for 3 months now..

What a load of twaddle - Larry Page owns toolbar page rank not Google - it is owned by Stanford University. And Google have not incorporated it into their algorithms - Speaking as a mod over at www.webproworld.com and as owner of TIP - if Google had of done anything like that -I'd have been the first to know.

Here, this is from a guy that you may have heard of.

 Offline

Posts: 2735



     Re: Aaron Wall: The Death of Keyword Density Tools
« Reply #7 on: Yesterday at 03:48 PM » Quote  

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quote from: Mike Bradbury on June 08, 2007, 03:45 PM
People say that toolbar PageRank is useless.  Not true.  Its a good snapshotl way to determine the quality of a link that you're getting.

The term 'snapshot' is interesting. I would have to agree with that. And it is that snapshot that people tend to obsess over.

People tend to equate PageRank with SERPS. The fact is that PR has nothing to do with promising keyword searches, at least not with Google. There is a dilemma and the angst over PageRank.


Quote from: Mike Bradbury on June 08, 2007, 03:45 PM
I will say the same of Keyword Density.  While it isn't the end all be all, it is a good start, and I know that pages which I optimize that have a higher keyword density in their content still tend to rank better than those that I write naturally.  


Combined with proper Html structuring such as Hx tags, keyword dense pages will drive it home. You also need to "lead" the spider. This can be achieved by maximizing/minimizing your internal/external links and funneling them inward with strong text links. Every single page on your site should always emphasize the one above it, structurally speaking of course.

Outbound links can affect your keyword density and in some situations, negate it. As an extreme example, lets say you have blog that writes about "native american art". You also have a blogroll that includes strong links to Photoshop examples, graphic sofware, etc.  Those links will 'categorize' the page as more technical than 'native american'. You are what you link.

Tools for keyword density and the like should be used with a grain of salt. It is never one thing, it is all things. If you use a tool responsibly and know how it fits into the grand scheme of things, then you probably are not reading this post for suggestions.

you know what .. im not even going to bother replying ..

this thread was a simple request for people looking to place a block of 9 links on their website ( 1 way out ) and get paid for it .. simple..

didnt need you getting on your high horse and distract the thread.

I'll PM ashley and see if he'll remove your off-topic posts because i assume you wont ..and they are off topic... because if PR isnt relevant then there was no need for you to babble on about it

wow.. that shows maturity ...

OK but I agree with David. I think he's making a point about pagerank as you are paying out for the level of pagerank which means f-all. So logically speaking paying more for a PR5 than a PR3 is wrong. I am mostly available on skype text chat.

Hi there

I actually know Chris. I don't think there was any need to ban him, he's certainly no spammer.

He's effectively offering to buy advertising space on your websites, i've offered him a number of URLs of mine.

You all know my thoughts on Pagerank for SELLING LINKS, so i can understand why he'd offer to pay more for certain PR sites. I think some of the comments on here are a little un called for....